24 Sep
2009
24 Sep
'09
4:44 p.m.
On 24 sep 2009, at 16:30, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
If a /24 is used for NAT, considering the size of RIPE meetings, I guess nobody will notice anything inconvenient.
It's a 1 in 3 mapping if you count heads, I guess devices is 1 on 5 :) If you think this won't raise any issues I guess the world in general doesn't have a problem, we can simply extend the IPv4 space by a multiple of 5 :P Even if open ports wouldn't be an issue, think of: - inbound connections (people using VOIP) - VPN to connect back home (meeting is still providing fixed IP for that purpose) - CPU load - traceability (Pentagon got hacked by somebody at RIPE-XX) Groet, MarcoH