19 Jul
2011
19 Jul
'11
12:48 p.m.
[ address-policy-wg trimmed from Cc:] On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:40 +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
On 7/19/11 11:16 AM, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote:
I think we will keep having having these issues until the minimum subnet assignment (outside point to point links) can be smaller than /64 which is an astronomical waste of public addresses for a home or business assignment.
Maybe it's me, but I really don't understand what are you talking about. Can you please elaborate a bit on this?
Please take this off-list as this is out of scope for RIPE.
Actually, if people want to discuss this on the IPv6 working group list I don't mind. The IPv6 list is quite open for all IPv6-related discussions, whether they are related to RIPE or not. :) Thanks! -- Shane