On 9.11.10 4:29, Francis Dupont wrote:
We would appreciate if you let us know by the end of November 17, 2010 if you have read the document and whether you support the publication of the document.
=> yes
Hi, Thnx for your support (for support from all of you :) )
As long as we get at least 8 statements of support and no significant issues are raised, we will ask the RIPE NCC to publish the document after fixing minor editorial issues (if found).
=> there is at least one error: IKEv2 relies on IPsec-v3 so it is not possible to require IPsec-v2 and IKEv2 with IPsec-v3 optional. There are two ways to solve this: make IKEv2 optional or IMHO far better swap IPsec-v2 and IPsec-v3.
Theoretically I agree with you. But we try not to currently exclude too much hardware. What percentage of current equipment you can buy supports IPsec-v3 ?
BTW I think the correct spelling for UPNP is UPnP (lower case 'n').
Will fix, thnx. /jan