17 May
2014
17 May
'14
11:46 a.m.
In your letter dated Sat, 17 May 2014 08:12:04 +0200 you wrote:
The idea is to show that there is a middle way in which you can build a network that still gives a good user experience but with far l ess stress on IPv4 resources.
I'm curious about this statement. Is NAT464 over wifi or wired ethernet really easier than IPv6 native plus NAT44? I know NAT464 has advantages for 3G networks, but I have not seen anymore doing a comparison for wifi. Does anyone have a pointer?