Please wait a bit :) a) there might be others b) as much as we don’t like overhead, let’s come up with some procedure c) I need to have a chat with Shane on exactly how we are going to do this I had several people including one of the candidates asking for a soft landing, where Shane and I gradually remove ourselves out of this, rather than just running off. So at a minimum we need to fix this in terms of timelines. Also it is not a given that there must be three, I think 4 is too many and you definitely need 2 for redundancy. First question to the group: how many working group chairs do you want in the end? Thanks, Marco On 17 mei 2014, at 19:53, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si <jan@go6.si> wrote: <snip>
But now we've got 3 very good candidates - Jen, Dave and Benedikt - and I think we should rotate them in.
Excellent suggestion, let's rotate Jen, Dave and Benedikt in.
--
Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no