On Jul 20, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
On 7/20/11 8:05 PM, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
Do we -want- to make it optional? I'd call that a step backwards. The list is not so that every last ratty device someone dragged off their junk heap can fulfil it, after all.
I feel to agree with this statement...
what percentage of CPEs we "throw out" if we make this optional?
You mean mandatory requirement for IPsec right? How many CPEs would not be compliant if we kept it a mandatory requirement to implement IPsec? While I am a huge proponent of IPsec, I have seen so many TLS implementations take over and more are getting standardized that I am left wondering whether mandating IPsec on paper makes sense realistically. I have zero issues with keeping IPsec as mandatory for hosts but want to play devils advocate for a minute. - merike