Hi Jordi,

I see you also brought up on the v6ops list.   Let's see what the operator community has to say about this topic.

I'm not opposed to changing this, but I'm also aware that's CPEs rarely support all the mechanisms listed in that RFC.

~Tim

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:58 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
Hi Tim, all,

I've reviewed the latest version of the document and in general I agree. However, today is unacceptable that a CPE doesn't support IPv6-only + IPv4aaS, so RFC8585 must be a must in this type of document.

I think there must be a clear statement on that.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.




To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-wg