On 06/17/2015 01:45 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
On Jun 16, 2015, at 6:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
Personally I still think RFC 7045 is the most realistic on this point, but Fred would like things to get better ;-).
And I haven't finished with Dennis Ferguson's comment.
Bottom line, if one accepts the present status quo as the state forever, then we should stop with RFC 7045, and (with Fernando) agree to deprecate all extension headers. I'd like to not do that, and the only way I see to not do that is to not accept the status quo.
Not sure if that's simply a matter of an error in punctuation (or in my interpretation)... but for the record, I'm not arguing in favor of deprecating IPv6 EHs. Actually, I've worked to figured out what's the status quo, and working on stuff that may help to change that (e.g., RFC7112). Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492