Hello, MAP-(E/T) and lw4o6, both recently standardized, should also be considered. cheers, Yannis On 09/15/2015 11:43 AM, Jen Linkova wrote:
Hi Nadim,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Nadim Houeiss <nadim@win-dsl.com> wrote:
looking to start the deployment of ipv6 only network for a new part in my network , i need to have info about wish solution will be the best to be used for NAT64 techniques for new ipv6 only end users will be able to reach ipv4 different services and web servers on the web.
As far as I know most network vendors (Cisco, Juniper etc) support NAT64 on their equipment. However don't forget that you'd need DNS64 as well, so I'd suggest to check if the DNS solution you are using currently supports DNS64.
From my experience the main issue is not choosing a vendor for NAT64 but dealing with broken applications: - applications which assume than "no IPv4 address" means "no Internet connectivity" and not even trying to establish any connections if the device does not receive Ipv4 address; - applications which are using IPv4 literals; - applications which ask for "A" DNS RR only, so DNS64 does not help etc.
looking forward for your reply,
BTW I'm removing ipv-wg-chairs@ (as it is just an alias which is used to reach RIPE IPv6 Working group chairs) and adding RIPE IPv6 mailing list.