[ trimmed everything, but ipv6-wg to keep the noise down ] Benedikt Stockebrand wrote:
Hi folks,
Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> writes: [...}
There are a lot of topics to discuss on IPv6 WG which do not belong to address policy.
I fully agree with Jen here.
So do I, strongly [...]
That said, if I was more involved with the address policy WG, I'd also expect to get involved if someone proposed to dump some other WG discussions into "my" mailing list.
Also donning my (past) DB-WG hat for a minute, there's always the possibility to include an item like "input from other WGs or TFs" into the WG Meeting's draft agenda. I have done that for years, and it worked quite OK (for the most recent time in London, receiving input from Routing. So, *that*is no reason in my books to talk about dismantling a useful and active WG. No rocket science here, just a tad of looking across the fence :-) [...]
As far as I'm concerned, I do archive the address policy WG, but I don't generally follow it. And I've got a strong impression that there are others who actively monitor the IPv6 list but don't even archive the address policy list.
Just fwiw, all of the WGs' mailing lists are archived at the NCC's website
however from my point of view we've seen enough support to keep IPv6 list untouched.
I think so. Regards, Wilfried.
So do I.
\begin{wg-chair-mode} To deal with this question properly I suggest we follow a two step approach:
- First we see *on the IPv6 WG mailing list*---and please set the rcpt accordingly---if there is some sort of consensus to propose a merger with the address policy WG list.
- If that consensus is actually reached, then as the second step the address policy WG should decide if they actually agree with our (IPv6) discussions moving there.
I haven't had time to talk about this with Jen and Dave directly, but as far as I'm concerned if there is no further discussion on this on the IPv6 mailing list, I'll consider that as consensus with Jen's statement and assume the question settled. \end{wg-chair-mode}
Cheers,
Benedikt