Hi, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:17:41PM +0000, Carlos Friacas wrote:
The following are some of my personal views about it...
I agree with almost all of Gert's views on this, my only doubt goes to the "2000 figure". Isnt it a bit small? Why not look at the actual routing table, and project things a bit further? Why not multiply it by 5 or 6?
The figure was not chosen in any highly scientific way. It is a figure that is "large enough that nearly every active LIR today can get an IPv6 allocation NOW" (having somewhat over 3000 LIRs in RIPE land, of which some are not active any more, others have merged, and so on), while at the other hand being small enough so that *if* this turns out to be a mistake, it means "6000 'IPv6 swamp' prefixes in the global routing table", and this is something the routers can handle.
Gert's math refers about 0.001 of 1/8th... 0.005 or even 0.010 seems to me perfectly reasonable...
Yes, but that would mean 60.000 "bad routes" (if it turns out to be wrong), that's where the 3x2000 number came from.
I also have one question and probably its because i havent been at RIPE-41 or because i didnt pay attention to some document... i now hear about /32s... People that already has a /35 will have their allocation somehow morphed in a /32, or the /32 will be just applied onward? Perhaps its a senseless question, but will probably have a short & fast answer... ;-)
It's in the draft somewhere: existing /35s get extended to /32s, no questions asked besides "do you want this?". As far as I can remember, there was consensus on this point in the RIPE group. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71770 (72395) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299