Kim Hubbard wrote: ...
Bob,
I understand your concerns but I honestly think you can accomplish your goals using the slow start method. If an organization requesting address space can justify a larger block than a /35 for heirarchical reasons or other than they will receive it. I believe many organizations will start out *very* slow at first so I don't see a reason to issue the entire sub-tla. Instead, issuing a smaller block (8K+) will give the RIRs ample time to verify that the organizations are utilizing the space and sending reassignment info, etc.
Kim, This is the argument you gave us in Minn. and I bought it, as long as it is *not* transformed later into an excuse for sub-allocating the /29s and thereby inviting the creation of an IPv6 toxic waste dump. That's why I'm eagerly awaiting the exact wording of the new draft. Brian