Hiya all, You might also want to read my thoughts on the same issues sent to this list on 8th Feb 2001, viewable at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/ipv6-wg/20010101-20010401/msg00017.ht... or http://www.djp.net/ipv6/proposal.html In summary: What we presently have is unworkable - at the least it will result in fragemented routing announcements. Utilisations of 80-90% are unachievable with IPv6. We need a better solution with much less emphasis on conservation and a fair allocations of bits to internet hierarchy and infrastucture. Additionally, allocations should fall on 4 boundaries (as I believe was originally intended) to simplfy notation/understanding and prevent some mistakes. Cheers Dave On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Ray Plzak wrote: ->Niall, -> ->Thanks for the quick response. -> ->Ray -> ->> -----Original Message----- ->> From: Niall Richard Murphy [mailto:niallm-ripe@enigma.ie] ->> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:52 AM ->> To: Ray Plzak ->> Cc: david@iprg.nokia.com; ipv6-wg@ripe.net ->> Subject: Re: draft agenda (v2) for IPv6 working group RIPE39 ->> ->> ->> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:39:36AM -0400, Ray Plzak wrote: ->> > David, ->> > ->> > One of the agenda items is: ->> > ->> > F. Draft on allocation sizes ->> > (Niall Murphy) ->> > ->> > ->> > Is this draft available for reading prior to the meeting? ->> > ->> > ->> > Ray ->> ->> A related document is available at ->> ->> http://www.enigma.ie/articles/global-ipv6-alteration.html ->> ->> Niall ->> -- ->> Enigma Consulting Limited: Security, UNIX and ->> telecommunications consultants. ->> Address: Floor 2, 45 Dawson Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. ->> http://www.enigma.ie/ ->