25 May
2018
25 May
'18
3:54 p.m.
On 25 May 2018, at 12:49, Antonio Prado via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
i'd prefer to continue stressing the technical aspects of Y.Pv6RefModel, instead of complaining about ITU's relevance in the topic.
Antonio, while it’s important to talk about the technical aspects of Y.IPv6RefModel -- please tell the WG what you think about it! -- we should not lose sight of the layer 9+ aspects. These are important too. SG20 didn’t volunteer to bring this document to the WG. They were made to do it. If those interventions in Geneva hadn’t happened, we probably wouldn’t have seen this document until it finally got published as a Recommendation.