Editorial comment: the bullet ... "If 6PE is requested, the equipment must comply with "Connecting IPv6 Islands over IPv4 MPLS Using IPv6 Provider Edge Routers (6PE)” [RFC4798]" ... in the "router or layer-3 switch" section is rephrased somewhat more generically in the bullet ... "If MPLS functionality (for example, BGP-free core, MPLS TE, MPLS FRR) is requested, the PE-routers and route reflectors must support "Connecting IPv6 Islands over IPv4 MPLS Using IPv6 Provider Edge Routers (6PE)" [RFC 4798]" ... in the same section. I would suggest we remove the first one. Ivan Pepelnjak www.ioshints.info/about
-----Original Message----- From: ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of David Kessens Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 11:56 AM To: ipv6-wg@ripe.net Subject: [ipv6-wg] Last Call (20101123) on changes: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment
Working Group,
The Last Call on "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" draft was completed on 20101117.
We received 5 statements of support (not counting one of the authors) on the mailing list and various verbal statements of support during the RIPE meeting. We feel that this is close enough to the 8 statements of support that we requested in order to move ahead with publication.
In addition, there was also some discussion on the mailing list regarding a few editorial changes and some discussion regarding MPLS requirements.
Jan has produced a new version of the document that reflects the discussion. The document is available on the RIPE website:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ipv6-ict-requirements.html
We would like to issue a brief Last Call to make sure that the changes accurately reflect the discussion on the mailing list.
Please let us know by the end of November 23, 2010 if you don't agree with the changes. As the number of formal statements of support was a little at the low side we would also like to encourage you to state your support for the document if you haven't done so already.
David, Marco & Shane Co-chairs of the IPv6 working group ---