Steve,
Do
not you think that this is going too far? Especially if everyone is adding
his/her own requirements...
For
example, I cannot imagine a residential CPE having any kind of flow export ;-)
I
would prefer to have RIPE-501 focus on the bare minimum requirements in order
to get IPv6 deployed as soon as possible: this means enough requirements to be
deployed in a secure, interoperable and manageable way but no more as we (at
least I) prefer to have multiple ‘compliant’ devices.
Hope
this helps and does not sound to vendor originated (see my affiliation)
-éric
From:
ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:ipv6-wg-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Nash,
Steve
Sent: mercredi 5 janvier 2011 10:40
To: ipv6-wg@ripe.net
Subject: [ipv6-wg] "Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment"
comment
Regarding:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-501.html
I find no mention of flow instrumentation in
the November 2010 document.
I suggest that “router and layer 3 switch”
Mandatory support should include maintenance and export of flow records ,
ideally compliant with rfc 3917, with sampling rate capability of at least 1
per 1000 packets, at the maximum packet rate of the device.
Regards
Steve Nash
________________________
Steve
Nash CEng MIET
Consulting Engineer
Arbor
Networks
office
+44 118 967 4917
mobile
+44 772 029 1359
How
networks grow™
________________________