Hi, On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 04:41:29PM +0100, Francis Dupont wrote:
So we're not violating established internet standards here (by using /124s) and we're not going to end in network hell. At least not due to this :-) => you are violating established internet standard...
"established"? I beg to differ. If one were to count, I'd say that there are more point-to-point links out there that are NOT using /64s than otherwise.
which is *really* handy for quick and painless address management. Doing that with a /64 per link (putting router-id and link number further to the left) means "waste a /32", which is certainly not compatible with the current RIPE policies...
=> you have the whole freedom on 63 bits of the interface ID. I don't understand your argument.
I have more than one link. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 56029 (55671) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster@Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299