Gert,
Gert Doering wrote: Currently there is no other working and implemented way to get v6 multihoming. Multiple /48s obviously do not work (think failover of established TCP sessions and routing policy decisions), regional addressing isn't here (and I'm unsure how that is supposed to work concerning non-rationality of upstream networks), so what else do we have?
There is no current v6 multihoming solution, and we know it. It will not be ready for months at best and we also know that. I repeatedly voiced loudly my dissatisfaction about the lack of progress towards a v6 multihoming solutions. We are actively working on it. Nevertheless, no matter how good the reasons, even tacitly allowing /48s in the routing table does create a terrible precedent. Michel.