24 Jul
2011
24 Jul
'11
6 p.m.
I agree ... Isacco Inviato da iPad Il giorno 24/lug/2011, alle ore 16:12, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> ha scritto:
Hi,
If the equipment doesn't support IS-IS, then you can't expect it to support IS-IS MT ;)
Anyway, making IS-IS mandatory makes absolutely no sense; it's rarely used in Enterprise environments.
What we could do is to change the current requirement into "If the equipment supports IS-IS routing protocol, it MUST support IS-IS MT ..." (don’t cut/paste, use the wording from the document ;)
Sounds like good advise :)
Thanks,
Sander