10 Apr
2003
10 Apr
'03
3:18 a.m.
Jeroen,
Jeroen Massar wrote: Stupid question
There are no stupid questions.
but are we still 'allowed' to call the Top Level Aggregators a TLA. Eg... 2001:db8::/32 is a TLA
No. The wording "TLA" has been deprecated entirely. The very notion does not exist anymore. See: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-02.t xt The only remnant is a 6bone "pTLA" but given the sunset date for the 6bone in 9 months as far as allocation goes time will take care of that one.
Or is there another more appropriate name for the prefixes that are allowed in the DFZ?
The replacement is LIR. Michel.