João, On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 06:11:38PM +0100, João Damas wrote:
So, Shane could you perhaps merge all input up to this point and put a new version out for comment? Then David can perhaps wrap up the discussion and call for consensus?
Maybe you missed my mail regarding the procedure that we were going to follow to get a new charter in place, but it matches exactly what you came up with 10 days later ;-). David Kessens --- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:46:43 -0700 From: David Kessens <david.kessens@nsn.com> To: ipv6-wg@ripe.net Subject: Procedural approach for approval of new charter Hi, First of all, a big thank you to Shane for writing the new proposed charter. I propose that we spend until Oct 23 to give feedback to Shane. At that point, we will ask whether Shane can do a revision and I will issue a Last Call when the revision is ready so that we can get a new charter in place as soon as possible. And finally, it is nice to have a new shiny charter, but it is even more important that we as a community actually do something with it. For example, there is nothing that should stop individual participants to do proposals or volunteer for any activities that would bring our new charter (closer) to completion. For example, it would be good to hear how and whether we can do something regarding the issue that Geert Jan brought up about a week ago. David Kessens ---