On 6/7/11 9:19 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
We would also kindly ask you to voice your support of this document when you agree to the proposed text. This will help us to move forward knowing there is community support to publish a new version of the ripe-501 document. Dear v6 WG :)
Wv6Day is over and we are switching back to regular schedule. We received some off-list comments for RIPE-501 followup (or next version) document, but we would like to encourage more people to read the draft, posted here on 6.6.2011 and comment - or express support if they agree with the text. There is at least one voting point in the draft, which CPE spec variant should we leave in the final doc and we need your input on that. We like both of them, which one you prefer? Thnx and cheers from the authors, Merike, Sander and Jan