David, On 2010-01-22 07:23, David Kessens wrote:
As mentioned earlier, I would like to write down our approach for co-chair selection. This would help us to have an open and transparent process to get a cochair appointed, but also help in the future for other working groups as either an example or at the minimum that they can use the same set of principles.
Regardless of my feelings about this proposal, the IPv6 working group is not the right place to discuss issues that affect the entire RIPE community. At least, I don't remember seeing "RIPE meta-policy development" on the new IPv6 working group charter. ;) I'm not sure what the correct forum is - perhaps <ripe-list@ripe.net>, or perhaps in the smoke-filled room where the working group chairs make their global world domination plans. But I'm pretty sure that it's out of scope for this working group. An invitation to participate in this is surely appropriate to send to the IPv6 working group, and also to every other RIPE working group. Thanks, -- Shane