18 May
2014
18 May
'14
12:36 p.m.
On 17/05/14 23:41, Philip Homburg wrote:
So we can bitch on this list about Android not supporting NAT464, but in reality, are you going to tell users to dump their old devices, just because they don't support NAT464?
I would suggest being precise in names here so everybody understands what we are talking about - its 464XLAT and not NAT464... http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6877 cheers, Jan