10 Apr
2003
10 Apr
'03
3:15 p.m.
Hi, | IMO, TLA is *just* fine. I definately agree. The term, and the fealing associated with it, fits the entities that are the highest level of aggregation for any given IPv6 address perfectly for me. I'll stick to calling the /32's and their 6bone /28 and /24 siblings "TLA" until there is another common term for it. I don't see the need to change it though, as opposed to SLA and NLA which I no longer use. -- ---------- - - - - -+- - - - - ---------- Pim van Pelt Email: pim@ipng.nl http://www.ipng.nl/ IPv6 Deployment -----------------------------------------------