2 Feb
2010
2 Feb
'10
5:39 p.m.
Shane Kerr wrote:
But the idea that no production networks can use RFC 1918 is a bit disturbing, because in 2 years or so there won't be any IPv4 addresses left, and people will be forced to use RFC 1918 addresses. Does that mean there won't be any IPv4 production networks in 2013?
Shane, Please, don't push the CGN(or LSN) idea any further. NAT-ing the whole ISP networks would permanently kill end2end paradigm. I don't want to see my whole city or even country to operate in RFC1918 address space behind one big NAT in near future. Sorry, I agree with Gert. :) /jan