please guide through IPv6 only on Wi-Fi dedicated (PTP and PTMP) and Hotspot. This area is ripe for IPv6 only network requiring less complexity.


IMTIAZ AHMED
(Chief Executive Officer)

TEDS (Private) Limited

273-B, St.55, F-11/4, Islamabad-44000.
T: +92 512 211 700 ,  M: +92 334 516 76 09 E: ceo@teds.pk




On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com> wrote:
FYI, there is a wiki being used to track how things behave in the
IPv6-only (and the NAT64) world; specifically focused on the case of
hosts without *any* IPv4 at all.

you're welcome to browse, and contribute. :-)   Contribution does
require a (moderated) login; but it's open to anyone who doesn't act
like a spambot.

http://wiki.test-ipv6.com/



On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am running an IPv6-only network, but to be honest it is not yet
> ready to to handle all my use cases. Often operating system updates
> fail due to ipv4-only update servers. The equipment is all software,
> the switch is openvswitch on a 12-NIC linux box from soekris, the
> router is a linux box and most of the systems are linux systems. Thus
> I am able to implement everything what I am missing in software. I do
> not have to wait for vendors to implement a specific feature. The
> downside of this is, that it quite slow. It works for small work
> groups, but it would never scale up to enterprise environment.
>
> Dual Stack networks and NAT64 networks cost more money, so I see a
> real business case for IPv6-only as soon as there are no bigger
> business cases bound to ipv4 (like hundreds(!) of enterprise
> applications that were in the stoneage of IT)
>
> Best regards
>
> Dan
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I saw this today:
>>
>> http://wiki.test-ipv6.com/wiki/Main_Page
>>
>> And I was thinking about the seeming increase in interest recently in
>> researching the realities of an IPv6-only world.
>>
>> According to Cisco's IPv6 stats site:
>>
>> http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/
>>
>> We're a long way from having most content available over IPv6... but
>> not *that* long, if we can take the 40% numbers seriously.
>>
>> So I guess this is mostly a "setting the groundwork" for now, but maybe
>> not. Does anyone actually run an IPv6-only network now, or is thinking
>> about it? (As in, without a gateway to the IPv4 world.)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Shane
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Luedtke
> http://www.danrl.de
>



--
 Jason Fesler, email/jabber <jfesler@gigo.com> resume: http://jfesler.com
 "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day;
 set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."