I'm confused. Are you (Marco) and Shane also going to (eventually) step down? I hope not. Also, about the right number of co-chairs, I think 2 is the one, but 3 seems to work for this WG. cheers, Yannis On 05/18/2014 11:00 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
Please wait a bit :)
a) there might be others b) as much as we dont like overhead, lets come up with some procedure c) I need to have a chat with Shane on exactly how we are going to do this
I had several people including one of the candidates asking for a soft landing, where Shane and I gradually remove ourselves out of this, rather than just running off. So at a minimum we need to fix this in terms of timelines.
Also it is not a given that there must be three, I think 4 is too many and you definitely need 2 for redundancy.
First question to the group: how many working group chairs do you want in the end?
Thanks,
Marco
On 17 mei 2014, at 19:53, Roger Jψrgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Jan Zorz @ go6.si <jan@go6.si> wrote: <snip>
But now we've got 3 very good candidates - Jen, Dave and Benedikt - and I think we should rotate them in. Excellent suggestion, let's rotate Jen, Dave and Benedikt in.
--
Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no