21 Oct
2011
21 Oct
'11
10:52 p.m.
On 10/21/11 10:32 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
Also keep in mind that RIPE-501(bis) addresses a very specific need: helping IT managers select the best real-life IPv6-capable equipment.
Hi, Indeed. That's the intention :)
We could put together the best list of RFCs and drafts, but if nobody supports them (and thus an IT manager using RIPE-501bis cannot buy the boxes he needs), we've just shot ourselves in the foot ... unless you word the document in a way that says RFC-xxxx is mandatory, but RFC-yyyy is highly recommended as its replacement and brings you bonus points.
I think it is that way (as we already had this discussion in the past)... Well established RFC is mandatory, "upgrade" optional - so I like to think :) /jan