On 10/20/11 8:22 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed [I-D.ymbk-aplusp] on the list, which recently became RFC 6346.
Hi, Sorry for late response. I thought I updated that (as co-author of that RFC it is expected to be aware of that change :) ) but it looks like it got lost between the versions somewhere. I suggest we corect that in final version.
Besides updating the list, do you find it appropriate to include RFCs with experimental status?
Why not? I agree not putting it into mandatory, but it could stay as optional, specially because it's architecture RFC and covers many flavors of A+P :)
Also 3484bis is still in draft. If we include drafts, then 6204 should also be changed to 6204bis. Although i would prefer to have the final RFCs in.
No, drafts are probably not ok. /jan