10 May
2002
10 May
'02
8:55 p.m.
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:35:56AM -0700, David Kessens wrote:
How did you justify your AS# to the RIPE NCC if you have 'political and economical' reasons that don't allow you to peer with at least three peers in the default-free zone (at this point ipv6 peerings tend to cost nothing by the way) ?!? We care about technical arguments here, not political problems.
There are some points to be made around this, but I don't think the ipv6-wg is the right forum (seeing as the actual demand in RIPE-195 is for IPv4 peers, which is also the case for AS#s). I'm not as savvy in the workings of the wgs as I wish I was. Which one would be right? routing-wg? Peter B. Juul, Uni�C (PBJ255-RIPE)