Re: [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2

Hi,

If the equipment doesn't support IS-IS, then you can't expect it to support IS-IS MT ;)

Anyway, making IS-IS mandatory makes absolutely no sense; it's rarely used in Enterprise environments.

What we could do is to change the current requirement into "If the equipment supports IS-IS routing protocol, it MUST support IS-IS MT ..." (don’t cut/paste, use the wording from the document ;)

Sounds like good advise :) Thanks, Sander