password: D0llemin@ Met vriendelijke groet, ir. A.W. (Andries) Hettema KPN IP-Office kpn-ip-office@kpn.com +31 70 45 13398
Question 1: Why was chosen for "SUB-ASSIGNED PA" and not for "SUB-ALLOCATED PA" or even "LIR-PARTITIONED PA", [...]
[...]
One is to aggregate many individual customers into an assignment block.
It's a rather bikeshedding issue, but maybe pick AGGREGATED PA? LIR-PARTITIONED PA would also be easily understandable, but is a mouthful. :)
I was about to come with the same suggestion. As said, the current one basically is just a placeholder as we needed something in the revision 1 document.
'AGGREGATED XX' is pretty much unique and clearly describes the whole purpose.
How do people feel about AGGREGATED-BY-LIR ? Stays in line with the current ones and describes the purpose.
I like it:) With kind regards, ir. A.W. (Andries) Hettema KPN IP-Office kpn-ip-office@kpn.com +31 70 45 13398