On Thursday 04 February 2010 00:44:05 David Kessens wrote: Hello all, as a relatively newcomer to this community, I would like to learn more about the duties and responsibilities of a WG [co]chair. As I understand it, the appointment procedures are quite informal with all the merits and shortcomings that come with it. Having said this, I have the impression that 3 people are better than one or two. I have met both candidates, read their comments for the WG and I support them both. I also think it would be a good idea for other people to come forward as well. The migration to IPv6 needs all the effort and support it can get, having active and expanding WG / forums such as this. Regards, Kostas Zorbadelos
I already have seen some discussion regarding point 2) and it leads me to believe that there is at least some support to appoint both candidates as co-chairs.
Before making such a determination though, I would like to see a bit more discussion/comments, especially from people who have not taken a position yet on this topic.
Basically, knowing our candidates, I would like to hear from you whether you prefer to appoint one or two co-chairs, and whether you have any preference for either candidate in case you believe one co-chair is enough.
---