Martin, On 2010-02-03 10:58, Martin Millnert wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 10:01 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
If people think there is an interest in having a NAT-broken network around, then please make it available on a dedicated SSID, but don't experiment with the meeting network.
Short version:
I second this statement.
This makes sense. Although of course I would like this to be something like: RIPE 61: ESSID RIPE is globally-unique IPv4+IPv6, ESSID RIPE-NAT is NAT IPv4 plus globally-unique IPv6 RIPE 63: ESSID RIPE is NAT IPv4 plus globally-unique IPv6 ESSID RIPE-NO-NAT is globally unique IPv4+IPv6 In the future we could further mimic the "real world" by charging money for the use of the RIPE-NO-NAT network. For a sufficently massive fee we could probably even keep addresses persistent between meetings. ;) -- Shane