* Marc Blanchet
On 14 May 2015, at 11:41, Jan Zorz wrote:
Dear IPv6 WG,
As promised during the IPv6 WG meeting at RIPE70, I'm sending the link with information how to test remotely different implementations of NAT64 that we are running in Go6lab:
http://go6lab.si/current-ipv6-tests/nat64dns64-public-test/
Ecdysis is the weakest one and somehow a bit buggy,
why is it?
FYI, Ecdysis has been integrated into OpenBSD pf and is now part of the OpenBSD bistro. That version is more stable. So I would suggest to use an openbsd platform to do testing and get best results (compared to the linux one).
Or, if there is a desire to run the implementation Linux in the first place, I'd suggest Jool (http://jool.mx), which is actively maintained. BTW all the NAT64 prefixes given on the page are incorrect, at least if the ping6 test targets given are correct the NAT64 prefixes are all /96es, not /64s. Tore