Hi, Gert Doering schrieb:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:30:38PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Two can play the RFC quoting game (2460):
There's a certain fun value to watch your "I can quote more interesting things from the RFC" game - but:
** can we please try to focus on "do we want to issue this resolution, ** and if yes, which words need changing"?
a) seconded, or this tends to get a "ignored by the sane people" thread like this 240/4 thingy on the NANOG-list... Please discuss that stuff in private or ask RIPE to open an "Advocacy WG" + list.. thanks. b) there aren't that many change-requeensts (nono, no ITIL...) for the wording, are they? Did i miss something in the mess? -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz@baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================