- ipv6-wg - mailman.ripe.net

IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey Now Underway!
by Paul Rendek 19 Jun '09

19 Jun '09

[Apologies for duplicates] Dear Colleagues, As announced at RIPE 58, TNO and GNKS Consult are working with the RIPE NCC to conduct a survey, sponsored by the European Commission, on the current and future use of IPv6 throughout the RIPE NCC service region. The IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey is now online, and we encourage all members of the RIPE community to participate: http://is-nri.com/take/?i=150597&h=1GwWe3dXXMcPrRrOw5s2yg The purpose of the survey is to better understand where the community is moving, and what can be done to ensure the Internet community is ready for the widespread adoption of IPv6. The survey was developed in consultation with members of the RIPE community, and is inspired by the 2008 survey conducted by ARIN and CAIDA in North America. It is sponsored by the European Commission, which has actively supported the adoption of IPv6, in the interests of innovation and the continuing competitiveness of European industry. We encourage all organisations in the RIPE NCC service region to participate in this survey, which we hope will establish a comprehensive view of present IPv6 penetration and future plans for IPv6 deployment. By making the survey design similar to the ARIN/CAIDA survey, we hope that the results will contribute to a better global picture of current and future IPv6 deployment. The survey is composed of 16 questions and can be completed in 10-15 minutes. For those without IPv6 allocations or assignments, or who have not yet deployed IPv6, the questions will be fewer in number. The survey will close on 3 July 2009. Results of the IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey will be presented and discussed at RIPE 59, which will be held 5-9 October in Lisbon, Portugal. Results will also be published on IPv6 Act Now: http://ipv6actnow.org Please provide your name and contact information on the survey form if you wish to receive the draft survey analysis when available. Please also indicate whether you are willing to share additional data with the TNO and GNKS Consult IPv6 Deployment Monitoring team. We appreciate your time and interest in completing this survey. If you have any questions concerning the survey, please send an email to <info(a)gnksconsult.com >. Regards, Paul Rendek Head of External Relations and Communications RIPE NCC

5 5

IPv6 testimonial with Randy Bush
by Rumy Kanis 15 Jun '09

15 Jun '09

Dear colleagues, As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, we are proud to announce the next in our series of interviews. Randy Bush from IIJ discusses IPv6 deployment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh3i6lDqWBM&feature=channel So far, we have interviewed 22 people from the community about their experiences and are very busy editing all the video material. In the coming months, you will be able to enjoy the rest of the interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/RIPENCC These interviews will also be published on our e-learning page and on our IPv6 Act Now website: http://ripe.net/training/e-learning/ http://www.ipv6actnow.org/ Kind regards, Rumy Kanis Training Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

IPv6 testimonial with Andy Davidson
by Rumy Kanis 28 May '09

28 May '09

Dear colleagues, As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, I am proud to announce the first in a series of interviews. Andy Davidson of NetSumo ISP Consultancy discusses the IPv6 deployment they have done for their customers and themselves: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU So far, we have interviewed 22 people from the community about their experiences and are very busy editing all the video material. In the coming months, you will be able to enjoy the rest of the interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/RIPENCC These interviews will also be published on our e-learning page and on our IPv6 Act Now website: http://ripe.net/training/e-learning/ http://www.ipv6actnow.org/ Kind regards, Rumy Kanis Training Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

Website Launch: www.IPv6ActNow.org
by Paul Rendek 26 May '09

26 May '09

[Apologies for duplicate emails.] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC is pleased to announce the launch of the IPv6 Act Now! website. www.IPv6ActNow.org is a one stop website that explains IPv6 in terms that everyone can understand and provides a variety of useful information aimed at promoting the global adoption of IPv6. The site is for anyone with an interest in IPv6, including network engineers, company directors, law enforcement agencies, government representatives and civil society. The site content is regularly updated and includes: - Education, advice and opinions from the experts - Latest IPv6-related news stories - Videos and articles from Internet community leaders - Current IPv4 exhaustion and IPv6 uptake statistics - The RIPE community's statement on IPv6 deployment, including a list of organisations supporting this statement - Information on community-developed IPv6 distribution policies - Useful links to other sources of information about IPv6 - A forum for everyone to share experiences, ask questions and find answers The site also includes contributions from other Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) and industry partners. We invite you to take a look around the site. We hope that you find it useful. If you have and comments or suggestions about IPv6ActNow!, please contact us at <ipv6actnow(a)ripe.net>. Regards, Paul Rendek Head of External Relations and Communication RIPE NCC

12 19

Agenda for ipv6 wg RIPE58
by David Kessens 05 May '09

05 May '09

Please see below for our agenda. During the next RIPE meeting, our working group is scheduled to meet: Tue, May 5, 2009, 16:00-18:00 in the Krasnapolsky Hotel in Amsterdam. See you later today! David Kessens --- Agenda for the IPv6 Working Group Meeting RIPE58 When: Tue, May 5, 2009, 16:00-18:00 Where: Krasnapolsky Hotel in Amsterdam A. Administrative stuff - appointment of scribe - agenda bashing (David Kessens) B. Developments/initiatives regarding IPv6 in the RIPE region and beyond (input from the audience) - Paul Hoogsteder, IPv6 peering BoF C. RIPE NCC IPv6 update diving a bit more into things outside of the NCC network itself, but also some of the measurements we have from our services (Erik Romijn) D. Google IPv6 update (Lorenzo Colitti) E. Report(s) about *actual* v6 traffic volume as compared to v4? *what's real* out there, not what's on powerpoint? (input from the audience) - Martin J. Levy F. Global IPv6 routing table status (Gert Doering) G. Discussion: deaggration of /32 prefixes, recent discussion on address policy working group The RIPE IPv6 allocation policy says in section '5. Policies for Allocations and Assignments': "b) advertise the allocation that they will receive as a single prefix if the prefix is to be used on the Internet" (input from the audience, input to address policy working group) H. Overview of ISOC's current activity with regard to IPv6 deployment. (Matthew Ford) I. Proposed EU IPv6 survey (Maarten Botterman, GNKS Consult) ... Y. Input for the RIPE NCC Activity Plan (input from the audience) Z. AOB ---

1 0

Draft agenda (v1) for ipv6 wg RIPE58
by David Kessens 28 Apr '09

28 Apr '09

During the next RIPE meeting, our working group is scheduled to meet: Tue, May 5, 2009, 16:00-18:00 in the Krasnapolsky Hotel in Amsterdam. I have prepared a first draft version of the agenda. As usual, there will be quite a bit of attention to IPv6 in the plenary sessions as well and the talks about IPv6 DSL deployments should be especially interesting. David Kessens --- Draft Agenda (v1) for the IPv6 Working Group Meeting RIPE58 When: Tue, May 5, 2009, 16:00-18:00 Where: Krasnapolsky Hotel in Amsterdam A. Administrative stuff - appointment of scribe - agenda bashing (David Kessens) B. RIPE NCC IPv6 update diving a bit more into things outside of the NCC network itself, but also some of the measurements we have from our services (Erik Romijn) C. Google IPv6 update (Lorenzo Colitti) D. Report(s) about *actual* v6 traffic volume as compared to v4? *what's real* out there, not what's on powerpoint? (input from the audience) E. Global IPv6 routing table status (Gert Doering) F. Discussion: deaggration of /32 prefixes, recent discussion on address policy working group (input from the audience, input to address policy working group) G. Overview of ISOC's current activity with regard to IPv6 deployment. (Matthew Ford) H. Proposed EU IPv6 survey (speaker to be determined, TNO) I. Developments/initiatives regarding IPv6 in the RIPE region and beyond (input from the audience) ... Y. Input for the RIPE NCC Activity Plan (input from the audience) Z. AOB ---

1 0

Call for agenda topics RIPE 58
by David Kessens 15 Apr '09

15 Apr '09

The next RIPE meeting, RIPE 58, is fast approaching. This means that it is getting time to compose an agenda for our working group that is scheduled to meet on Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 16:00-18:00 in the Krasnapolsky Hotel in Amsterdam. Please let me know if you have any suggestions for agenda topics: very brief or longer topics, offers for a presentation or just a suggestion for a discussion topic are all welcome as long as they are interesting technical topics that will help with the deployment of IPv6 in the RIPE region. Thanks, David Kessens ---

1 0

IPv6 questions regarding ripe and address ranges
by Peeters, Ralph 17 Mar '09

17 Mar '09

Hello, My name is Ralph and i'm researching the options for IPv6 within my company. From previous contact with the ripe i've understood that there are 3 ways to get IPv6 ranges: - ISP assigned, i don't like this option because of renumbering issues when transferring to a different ISP - Ripe member, this way my organisation will become a member and can request own adresses based upon need - PI assigned, coming (hopefully) this year My company has several locations on several continents, which raises the following questions: -If we would become a ripe member, how would we deal with IPv6 range requests outside the ripe "juristiction", like in north america? -It is my understanding that the ripe member policy assigns /32sh and no /48sh which, from my standpoint, seems a bit unnecessary because there will be equal number of routing entries because we will require one range per location no matter the prefix. From what i've learned so far this could basically result in a /32 for a 100-user location which cannot be the goal, even though i might be stuck in IPv4 ways. - Isn't it possible to get a /32 and allow us to divide it between our sites with /48sh (and allowing them to advertise /48sh globally)? Sincerely, Ralph Peeters This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for use by the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and with a 'reply' message. Thank you for your co-operation.

4 5

2008 IPv4 Address Use Report
by Iljitsch van Beijnum 01 Jan '09

01 Jan '09

[ (Non-cross)posted to IETF discussions, NANOG, PPML, RIPE IPv6 wg, Dutch IPv6 TF. Web version for the monospace font impaired and with some links: http://www.bgpexpert.com/addrspace2008.php ] 2008 IPv4 Address Use Report As of January first, 2009, the number of unused IPv4 addresses is 925.58 million. On January 1, 2008, it was 1122.85 million. So in 2008, 197.27 million addresses were used up. With 3706.65 million usable addresses, this means that 75.3% of the available IPv4 addresses are in some kind of use, up from 69.7% a year ago. So the depletion of the IPv4 address reserves is continuing in much the same way as in previous years: Date Addresses free Used up 2006-01-01 1468.61 M 2007-01-01 1300.65 M 167.96 M 2008-01-01 1122.85 M 177.80 M (with return of 16.78 M to IANA) 2009-01-01 925.58 M 197.27 M These figures are derived from from the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority's IPv4 Global Unicast Address Assignments page and the records published on the FTP servers of the five Regional Internet Registries (RIRs): AfriNIC, which gives out address space in Africa, APNIC (Asia-Pacific region), ARIN (North America), LACNIC (Latin American and the Caribbean) and the RIPE NCC (Europe, the former Soviet Union and the Middle East). The IANA list shows the status of all 256 blocks of 16777216 addresses identified by the first 8-bit number in the IPv4 address. (Note that the file is in a somewhat different format than in previous years.) The RIR data indicates how much address space the RIRs have delegated to internet service providers (and sometimes end-users). Delegated Blocks +/- 2008 Addresses Used Available to/status (in millions) AfriNIC 2 33.55 9.18 24.37 APNIC 30 +4 503.32 454.36 48.96 ARIN 31 +4 520.09 446.06 74.03 LACNIC 6 100.66 68.88 31.78 RIPE NCC 26 436.21 423.65 12.56 LEGACY 92 +1 1543.50 1363.29 180.21 UNALLOCATED 34 -9 570.43 570.43 Totals 221 3707.76 2765.42 942.34 The difference between the 942.34 million free addresses here and 925.58 million earlier is explained by the fact that the 43.0.0.0/8 legacy block shows up as delegated in the IANA list, but not in the APNIC delegation records. In previous years, 7.0.0.0/8 didn't show up in the IANA records but it did in the ARIN records. This has now been fixed, hence the increase in legacy delegations. No legacy blocks were returned to IANA in 2008. The total number of available addresses is slightly higher than the previously mentioned figure at 3707.76 million because the table above includes 172.16.0.0/12 and 192.168.0.0/16, which are set aside for private use. Networks 0.0.0.0/8 and 127.0.0.0/8 aren't usable because of special uses and 10.0.0.0/8 is also set aside for private use. 224 - 239 are multicast addresses, and 240 - 255 is class E, which is "reserved" for future use. If the class E space could be used, it would increase the available address space by 268 million addresses. The past two years, this has been a topic of hot debate in the IETF and elsewhere. The problem is that almost all operating systems need modification to be able to use class E addresses, and a good part of the installed base of devices connected to the internet must be considered unupgradable. The 2781.07 million addresses currently in use aren't very evenly distributed over the countries in the world. The current top 15 is: 2009-01-01 2008-01-01 increase Country 1 - US 1458.21 M 1408.15 M 4% United States 2 (3) CN 181.80 M 135.31 M 34% China 3 (2) JP 151.56 M 141.47 M 7% Japan 4 - EU 120.29 M 120.35 M 0% Multi-country in Europe 5 - GB 86.31 M 83.50 M 3% United Kingdom 6 (7) DE 81.75 M 72.46 M 13% Germany 7 (6) CA 74.49 M 73.20 M 2% Canada 8 - FR 68.04 M 67.79 M 0% France 9 - KR 66.82 M 58.86 M 14% Korea 10 - AU 36.26 M 33.43 M 8% Australia 11 (12) BR 29.75 M 23.46 M 27% Brazil 12 (11) IT 29.64 M 24.04 M 23% Italy 13 (16) TW 24.01 M 19.83 M 21% Taiwan 14 (18) RU 23.18 M 17.01 M 36% Russia 15 (14) ES 21.67 M 20.42 M 6% Spain In 2008, the United States was again the biggest user of new address space with no less than 50 million addresses added to the 1.4 billion they already had at the beginning of the year. China is a close second with 46.50 million new addresses. There is no clear trend in the growth percentages. A few countries like France and the UK show very modest growth, while other countries with a large installed base like Germany and Korea saw double digit growth percentages. And in addition to China, Brazil, Taiwan and Russia, but also Italy, are catching up. The US now holds 52.4% of the IPv4 address space in use. The total for the top 15 excluding the US is 35.8%. The rest of the world gets the remaining 327.23 million addresses, or 11.8%. The size of address blocks given out was increasing until 2005, but now shows a downturn. The table below shows the number of delegations for a certain range of block sizes (equal or higher than the first, lower than the second value). 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 < 1000 547 745 1022 1309 1507 1830 1896 1000 - 8000 897 1009 1516 1891 2265 2839 3235 8000 - 64k 822 1014 1100 1039 1192 1015 1129 64k - 500k 163 215 404 309 419 395 410 500k - 2M 29 46 61 60 57 62 82 > 2M 5 6 7 18 17 24 18 In millions of addresses: 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 < 1000 0.18 0.25 0.35 0.44 0.51 0.63 0.65 1000 - 8000 3.23 3.45 4.49 5.07 5.83 6.93 7.75 8000 - 64k 11.35 14.00 15.99 15.46 18.01 15.67 17.40 64k - 500k 20.28 25.51 42.01 34.23 50.86 50.83 52.58 500k - 2M 21.30 31.98 44.63 41.63 46.69 45.50 57.41 > 2M 12.58 12.58 20.97 68.62 52.43 67.37 54.00 The growth in the smallest and largest categories has been curtailed, but this growth now seems to happen in the second smallest and second largest categories, so the total effect isn't all that different, as indicated by the number of addresses given out per request/delegation: Year Blocks Addresses (M) Average block size 2000 2794 78.35 28043 2001 2824 88.95 31497 2002 2463 68.93 27985 2003 3035 87.77 28921 2004 4110 128.45 31252 2005 4626 165.45 35765 2006 5457 174.32 31945 2007 6165 186.92 30320 2008 6770 189.79 28035 (The numbers of addresses given out are lower here because ARIN often attributes the delegation of new addresses to a previous year, this view doesn't correct for that.)

1 0

RIPE NCC's Online Services Now IPv6 Enabled
by Andrei Robachevsky 24 Dec '08

24 Dec '08

Dear Colleagues, All of the RIPE NCC's major online services are now accessible via IPv6. These services include the web servers, ftp servers, DNS, the LIR Portal and mail system as well as the RIPE Database and all of the RIPE NCC's Information Services - Test Traffic Measurement (TTM) service, the Routing Information Service (RIS), DNS Monitoring (DNSMON) service and Hostcount. The RIPE NCC gradually enabled IPv6 for these services over the course of the last few years. Now that the two remaining services, the LIR Portal and the RIS, are also enabled, the RIPE NCC's entire service portfolio can be accessed using IPv6 as well as IPv4. This successfully completes the plan announced by the RIPE NCC at the RIPE 56 Meeting, held in Berlin in May, 2008 to enable IPv6-only users to access all the services offered by the RIPE NCC. More information about how to request IPv6 addresses from the RIPE NCC can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/info/faq/rs/ipv6.html Regards, Andrei Robachevsky Chief Technical Officer RIPE NCC

4 3