- ipv6-wg - mailman.ripe.net

New on RIPE Labs: Study on IPv6 Background Radiation
by Mirjam Kuehne 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

[apologies for duplicates] Dear colleagues, Geoff Huston has done an interesting study on "Background Radiation in IPv6". The results are published on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/background-radiation-in-ipv6 Kind Regards, Mirjam Kuehne RIPE NCC

1 0

US government IPv6 mandate
by Shane Kerr 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

All, Old-ish news, but I only saw this just now: http://news.techworld.com/networking/3241574/obama-administration-issues-ip… I look forward to success stories of people trying to get US visas using IPv6. ;) -- Shane

2 1

AUTO: Nicht erreichbar bis 4.10.2010 / Out of Office until 4.10.2010
by Joachim Strohbach 01 Oct '10

01 Oct '10

Ich bin bis 04.10.2010 abwesend. Danke für Ihre E-Mail-Nachricht. Ich bin bis 4. Oktober 2010 nicht im Büro. In dringenden Angelegenheiten kontaktieren Sie bitte DENIC IT-Services (E-Mail: its(a)denic.de, Tel: (069) 27235-160 oder -250). ----- Thank you for your email message. I am not in the office until 4 October 2010. In urgent cases please contact DENIC IT-Services (e-mail: its(a)denic.de, Tel: +49 69 27235-160 or -250). -- Joachim Strohbach Leiter IT-Services / Head of IT-Services DENIC eG Kaiserstraße 75-77 60329 Frankfurt am Main GERMANY E-Mail: strohbach(a)denic.de Fon: +49 69 27235-123 Fon: +49 69 27235-160 (Assistance) Fon: +49 69 27235-250 (IT-Services) Fax: +49 69 27235-239 SIP-URI: sip:123@denic.de http://www.denic.de PGP-KeyID: 0x7A8A00FF, Fingerprint: 30AB 0F15 17D3 995F CA50 F0A8 EA30 B915 7A8A 00FF Angaben nach § 25a Absatz 1 GenG: DENIC Domain Verwaltungs- und Betriebsgesellschaft eG (Sitz: Frankfurt am Main) Vorstand: Sabine Dolderer, Helga Krüger, Carsten Schiefner, Dr. Jörg Schweiger Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Elmar Knipp Eingetragen unter Nr. 770 im Genossenschaftsregister, Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main Hinweis: Dies ist eine automatische Antwort auf Ihre Nachricht "[ipv6-wg] New draft document available: Requirements For IPv6 in ICT Equipment" gesendet am 1.10.10 10:23:28. Diese ist die einzige Benachrichtigung, die Sie empfangen werden, während diese Person abwesend ist.

1 0

Call for agenda items for RIPE 61 in Rome
by Shane Kerr 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Hello, The next RIPE meeting is only 56 days away! The IPv6 working group is currently scheduled to meet on Tuesday, 2010-11-16 at 16:00. We are interested in your IPv6 presentations or discussions. All items that are IPv6-related are on-topic (including plans for IPv4 co-existence after run-out). Please send your proposals to David, Marco, or myself. See you in Rome! -- Shane

1 0

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments): discussion in the IPv6-WG mailing list
by Marco Hogewoning 10 Sep '10

10 Sep '10

Oh and could people at least cross-post ? On 3 sep 2010, at 21:13, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > On 3 sep 2010, at 17:30, Sander Steffann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>>> A new policy proposal, 2010-06, "Registration Requirements for IPv6 End >>>> User Assignments", was published to the IPv6 Working Group mailing list today. >>> >>> I think I like this policy, mostly. >>> >>> The only issue I have is that it appears to mandate that all assignments makes from a SUB-ASSIGNED PA block are exactly the length specified. This means that if the ISP has policies of, say, /56 for most customers but /48 for some, while at the same time wanting to implement some form of per-PoP prefix aggregation, it means assigning multiple blocks per aggregation point, one per assignment size. >> >> Allowing multiple "assignment-size:" fields might solve that. > > No it won't, you have a /40 with assignment size /56 and /64 and then how to specify which customer has what. Can't we solve this by allowing more specifics ? > > The original thought was to just create multiple entries, one for each assignment size. But we could allow for something like: > > bla:://40 -> assignment size /48 > bla::1/48 -> assignment size /56 > > MarcoH > MarcoH

8 13

2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
by Emilio Madaio 03 Sep '10

03 Sep '10

Dear Colleagues, A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion. The proposal has two purposes: to create a new policy document and to change a current one. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <ipv6-wg(a)ripe.net> before 29 September 2010. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

4 4

IPv6 RIPEness - Criteria for a Potential Fifth Star Rating - RIPE Labs
by Amanda Gowland 17 Aug '10

17 Aug '10

[Apologies for duplicates] Dear Colleagues, Earlier this year, RIPE Labs posted an article about IPv6 "RIPEness", a 4-star rating system of LIR IPv6 deployment. In that article, we asked for feedback on what criteria we could use to determine the potential addition of a 5th star to the rating system. We received some great feedback on how we could determine a 5-star RIPEness rating, you can read about it on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/becha/ipv6-ripeness-5th-star-criteria As always, any comments or suggestions are welcome. You can send us email or post in the article's comment section. Kind Regards, Amanda Gowland RIPE NCC

1 0

Updated IPv6 CPE Survey on RIPE Labs
by Mirjam Kuehne 26 Jul '10

26 Jul '10

[apologies for duplicates] Dear colleagues, Since Marco Hogewoning published the first version of the IPv6 CPE Survey on RIPE Labs just after the RIPE Meeting in May, he found additional information. The most up-to-date matrix, including data we received from some of the vendors in the meantime is now published on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated Should you have any additional experience with some of the equipment listed there, please leave a comment under the article or contact us at labs(a)ripe.net Kind Regards, Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC

1 0

Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
by Nathalie Trenaman 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

The Training team has been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to get them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation, they have a good idea how to subdivide prefixes over their network and how to write an addressing plan. Here's a PDF with the exercise (two pages A3): http://bit.ly/c7jZRJ We are curious to hear if you think it's clear and useful. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Nathalie Trenaman RIPE NCC Trainer (Big props go to Marco Hogewoning @XS4ALL)

1 0

Looking for comments
by Fred Baker 21 Jul '10

21 Jul '10

Hi IETF IPv6 Operations WG is looking at this draft, and we're interested in any comments you might have as well. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines "Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition Mechanisms", Jari Arkko, Fred Baker, 12-Jul-10

1 0