- ipv6-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Re: LIR 34.11 Discuss moving IPv6 policy matters to lir-wg
by Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet 12 Jan '00

12 Jan '00

Hi Hans Petter! >I would like to ask the lir-wg and the ipv6-wg to give its opinions on this >matter, and if possible to conclude. > >Conclusions could be: >1) Keep it as is >2) Move all policy discussions to lir-wg >3) Keep it as is for next n meetings My feeling is that the time has come to move IPv6 addressing policy and address distribution items to the LIR-WG, thus I'm proposing "option 2". I think it was indeed appropriate to take care of IPv6-specific issues in the framework of the IPv6-WG, in particular as long as we are/were living in a test-bed kind of environment. (Btw, 6Bone issues, as well as technical issues should still remain with the IPv6 WG) However, as LIRs now can request IPv6 address space *for production use* in much the same way as IPv4 addresses, there's not too much "special handling" requirements left, I suppose. Wilfried. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber(a)CC.UniVie.ac.at Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33 Vienna University : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140 Universitaetsstrasse 7 : RIPE-DB Handle: WW144 A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : PGP public key ID 0xF0ACB369 __________________________________________________________________________

1 0

LIR 34.11 Discuss moving IPv6 policy matters to lir-wg
by hph＠infostream.no 11 Jan '00

11 Jan '00

At the two last lir-wg meetings ar RIPE meetings the question of wether IPv6 policy matters should be discussed in a separate working group or in the lir-wg where all other policy matters are discussed has been brough up. Two meetings ago I rejected this suggestions for two reasons: - I did'n feel qualified to chair the rather detailed technical discussions going on related to the v6 policies - The lir-wg agenda was filled with other matters The reasons for suggesting moving the discussions to the policy forum is to keep policy discussions in one place, thus making schedulig simpler for policy interested meeting attendants. I would like to ask the lir-wg and the ipv6-wg to give its opinions on this matter, and if possible to conclude. Conclusions could be: 1) Keep it as is 2) Move all policy discussions to lir-wg 3) Keep it as is for next n meetings Yours, the lir-wg chair.

1 0

Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipngwg-mld-mib-02.txt
by Thomas Trede 11 Jan '00

11 Jan '00

FYI. Regards, Thomas Trede ----- Original Message ----- From: <Internet-Drafts(a)ietf.org> To: <IETF-Announce: ;> Cc: <ipng(a)sunroof.eng.sun.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 12:39 PM Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipngwg-mld-mib-02.txt > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the IPNG Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : IP Version 6 Management Information Base for The > Multicast Listener Discovery Protocol > Author(s) : B. Haberman, R. Worzella > Filename : draft-ietf-ipngwg-mld-mib-02.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 10-Jan-00 > > This document defines an experimental portion of the Management > Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in > Internet Protocol Version 6 internets. Specifically, this document > is the MIB module which defines managed objects for implementations > of the Multicast Listener Discovery Protocol [MLD]. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-mld-mib-02.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username > "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, > type "cd internet-drafts" and then > "get draft-ietf-ipngwg-mld-mib-02.txt". > > A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in > http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > > Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. > > Send a message to: > mailserv(a)ietf.org. > In the body type: > "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-mld-mib-02.txt". > > NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in > MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this > feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" > command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or > a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers > exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with > "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split > up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on > how to manipulate these messages. > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. >

1 0

Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipngwg-iana-tla-02.txt
by Thomas Trede 10 Jan '00

10 Jan '00

FYI. Regards, Thomas Trede ----- Original Message ----- From: <Internet-Drafts(a)ietf.org> To: <IETF-Announce: ;> Cc: <ipng(a)sunroof.eng.sun.com> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 12:49 PM Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipngwg-iana-tla-02.txt > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the IPNG Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Initial IPv6 Sub-TLA ID Assignments > Author(s) : B. Hinden, S. Deering, B. Fink, T. Hain > Filename : draft-ietf-ipngwg-iana-tla-02.txt > Pages : 6 > Date : 29-Dec-99 > > This document defines initial assignments of IPv6 Sub-TLA Aggregation > Identifiers (Sub-TLA ID) to the Address Registries and continued > management of the IP6.INT domain. It is intended as technical input > to the IANA from the IETF IP Next Generation (IPNG) and Next > Generation Transition (NGTRANS) working groups, as an input to the > process of developing guidelines for the allocation of IPv6 > addresses. > The IAB and IESG have authorized the Internet Assigned Numbers > Authority (IANA) as the appropriate entity to have the responsibility > for the management of the IPv6 address space as defined in [ALLOC]. > The proposed initial assignment described in the document is > consistent with: > - RFC 2373,'IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture' [ARCH] > - RFC 2374 'An Aggregatable Global Unicast Address Format' [AGGR] > - RFC 2450 'Proposed TLA and NLA Assignment Rules' [TLA-RULES]. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-iana-tla-02.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username > "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, > type "cd internet-drafts" and then > "get draft-ietf-ipngwg-iana-tla-02.txt". > > A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in > http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > > Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. > > Send a message to: > mailserv(a)ietf.org. > In the body type: > "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-iana-tla-02.txt". > > NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in > MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this > feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" > command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or > a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers > exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with > "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split > up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on > how to manipulate these messages. > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. >

1 0

IPv6 Policy Document Review - Call for comments
by RIPE NCC Staff 21 Dec '99

21 Dec '99

Dear colleagues, In July 1999, the three Regional Internet Registries (APNIC, ARIN, and the RIPE NCC) released the "Provisional IPv6 Assignment and Allocation Policy Document" (see http://www.ripe.net/lir/registries/ipv6.html) These initial policies and procedures have been carefully discussed within the community before publishing them. A formal review of the document was scheduled to start in October 1999, so that early experiences of IPv6 operation and administration could be fully evaluated and any necessary amendments made. The RIPE NCC, together with the other RIRs, now calls for comments to assist in this first review. We would like you to re-visit this document and we invite you to make any comments you feel would be constructive to the development of the next version. In particular, the RIRs seek your comments on the following sections of the document: * 4.2.3.2 Multihomed Sites This section was left unwritten in the first release, as there was insufficient experience to draw on in formulating a policy. We encourage any members of the community who have operational experience or interest in IPv6 and multi-homing to contribute suggestions for this section. * 4.2.8 Allocations to NLA Registries * 4.3.1 Assignments to End-users Review of these two sections is sought from members of the community who have relevant operational experience. * Definition of 'transit provider' A definition for the above term was not included in the current document. Comments and suggestions for an appropriate definition are encouraged. Finally, we also encourage you to take a look at the "IPv6 sub-TLA Request Form" (http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-195.html) and provide any comments or suggestions for improvements. Discussion will take place on the IPv6-WG mailing list <ipv6-wg(a)ripe.net>. If you prefer to submit any private comments, please do not hesitate to contact Nurani Nimpuno <nurani(a)ripe.net>. We would like to receive comments before the end of January. Kind Regards, Nurani Nimpuno Manager Registration Services RIPE NCC

2 1

request for an IPv6 tutorial speaker
by David Kessens 10 Dec '99

10 Dec '99

Hi, As we did last year, I would like to try to organize a tutorial on IPv6 again. For this to happen, I need volunteer(s) to give such a tutorial. Please contact me if you are willing to help us out. The next RIPE meeting is planned for: feb 22-25, 2000 in Amsterdam Duration and exact content of the tutorial can be determined by the speaker(s), the best day to hold the tutorial is probably feb 22. Feel free to forward this message to potential candidates that you might know. Thanks in advance for your help, David K. ---

1 0

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6multihome-with-aggr-00.txt]
by Thomas Trede 30 Nov '99

30 Nov '99

FYI. Regards, Thomas Trede

1 0

[Fwd: First IPv6 Conference in Germany]
by Thomas Trede 24 Nov '99

24 Nov '99

FYI. Regards, Thomas Trede

1 0

[Fwd: Request to Advance "DNS Extensions to Support IPv6 AddressAggregation and Renumbering"]
by Thomas Trede 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

FYI. Regards, Thomas Trede

1 0

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipngwg-scoped-routing-02.txt]
by Thomas Trede 23 Nov '99

23 Nov '99

FYI. Regards, Thomas Trede

1 0