- ipv6-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Call for agenda items for RIPE 61 in Rome
by Shane Kerr 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Hello, The next RIPE meeting is only 56 days away! The IPv6 working group is currently scheduled to meet on Tuesday, 2010-11-16 at 16:00. We are interested in your IPv6 presentations or discussions. All items that are IPv6-related are on-topic (including plans for IPv4 co-existence after run-out). Please send your proposals to David, Marco, or myself. See you in Rome! -- Shane

1 0

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments): discussion in the IPv6-WG mailing list
by Marco Hogewoning 10 Sep '10

10 Sep '10

Oh and could people at least cross-post ? On 3 sep 2010, at 21:13, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > On 3 sep 2010, at 17:30, Sander Steffann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>>> A new policy proposal, 2010-06, "Registration Requirements for IPv6 End >>>> User Assignments", was published to the IPv6 Working Group mailing list today. >>> >>> I think I like this policy, mostly. >>> >>> The only issue I have is that it appears to mandate that all assignments makes from a SUB-ASSIGNED PA block are exactly the length specified. This means that if the ISP has policies of, say, /56 for most customers but /48 for some, while at the same time wanting to implement some form of per-PoP prefix aggregation, it means assigning multiple blocks per aggregation point, one per assignment size. >> >> Allowing multiple "assignment-size:" fields might solve that. > > No it won't, you have a /40 with assignment size /56 and /64 and then how to specify which customer has what. Can't we solve this by allowing more specifics ? > > The original thought was to just create multiple entries, one for each assignment size. But we could allow for something like: > > bla:://40 -> assignment size /48 > bla::1/48 -> assignment size /56 > > MarcoH > MarcoH

8 13

2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
by Emilio Madaio 03 Sep '10

03 Sep '10

Dear Colleagues, A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion. The proposal has two purposes: to create a new policy document and to change a current one. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <ipv6-wg(a)ripe.net> before 29 September 2010. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

4 4

IPv6 RIPEness - Criteria for a Potential Fifth Star Rating - RIPE Labs
by Amanda Gowland 17 Aug '10

17 Aug '10

[Apologies for duplicates] Dear Colleagues, Earlier this year, RIPE Labs posted an article about IPv6 "RIPEness", a 4-star rating system of LIR IPv6 deployment. In that article, we asked for feedback on what criteria we could use to determine the potential addition of a 5th star to the rating system. We received some great feedback on how we could determine a 5-star RIPEness rating, you can read about it on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/becha/ipv6-ripeness-5th-star-criteria As always, any comments or suggestions are welcome. You can send us email or post in the article's comment section. Kind Regards, Amanda Gowland RIPE NCC

1 0

Updated IPv6 CPE Survey on RIPE Labs
by Mirjam Kuehne 26 Jul '10

26 Jul '10

[apologies for duplicates] Dear colleagues, Since Marco Hogewoning published the first version of the IPv6 CPE Survey on RIPE Labs just after the RIPE Meeting in May, he found additional information. The most up-to-date matrix, including data we received from some of the vendors in the meantime is now published on RIPE Labs: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated Should you have any additional experience with some of the equipment listed there, please leave a comment under the article or contact us at labs(a)ripe.net Kind Regards, Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC

1 0

Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
by Nathalie Trenaman 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

The Training team has been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to get them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation, they have a good idea how to subdivide prefixes over their network and how to write an addressing plan. Here's a PDF with the exercise (two pages A3): http://bit.ly/c7jZRJ We are curious to hear if you think it's clear and useful. Any feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Nathalie Trenaman RIPE NCC Trainer (Big props go to Marco Hogewoning @XS4ALL)

1 0

Looking for comments
by Fred Baker 21 Jul '10

21 Jul '10

Hi IETF IPv6 Operations WG is looking at this draft, and we're interested in any comments you might have as well. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines "Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition Mechanisms", Jari Arkko, Fred Baker, 12-Jul-10

1 0

IPv6 Conference in Jordan - 29 July 2010
by Ahmed Abu-Abed 18 Jul '10

18 Jul '10

Hello everyone, I am glad to announce that a one day IPv6 conference will be held in Amman, Jordan on Thursday 29th July, and the conference agenda is attached. This is organised by the IPv6 Forum - Jordan Chapter with RIPE NCC participation, and if interested in attending or sponsorship then please let me know. Best wishes, Ahmed Abu-Abed VP, IPv6 Forum - Jordan

1 0

IPv4 reaches a milestone: 365 days left
by Ahmed Abu-Abed 15 Jul '10

15 Jul '10

Greetings, Today the IPv4 counters show there is 1 year left for IANA IPv4 depletion date or X-Day, more details on the IPv6 Forum website. Note that this is a conservative estimate as a few months ago the prediction was October 2011. A less conservative estimate taking into consideration exponential growth of IPv4 demand on a regional level shows April 2011 for X-Day, more at http://ipv4depletion.com/ Best wishes, -Ahmed P.S. Download the depletion counter gadgets for Win, Mac and iPhone from http://inetcore.com/project/ipv4ec/index_en.html

3 4

Last call to participate: 2010 Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey
by Paul Rendek 14 Jul '10

14 Jul '10

[Apologies for duplicates] Dear Colleagues, This is a last-call reminder to participate in the 2010 Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey, conducted by GNKS Consult and TNO in collaboration with the RIPE NCC. The survey is available at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/IPv6deploymentmonitoring2010 The deadline to complete the survey is this Thursday, 1 July 2010. All five Regional Internet Registries have committed to soliciting participation in this survey in order to compile the most complete global IPv6 deployment data possible. The goal of the survey is to gain a better understanding of where the community is moving, and what can be done to ensure the Internet community is ready for the widespread adoption of IPv6. We encourage all organisations in the RIPE NCC service region to participate in this survey, which we hope will establish a comprehensive view of present IPv6 penetration and future plans for IPv6 deployment. The survey is composed of 23 questions and can be completed in about 15 minutes. For those without IPv6 allocations or assignments, or who have not yet deployed IPv6, the questions will be fewer in number. Results of the IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey will be presented and discussed at RIPE 61, which will be held 15-19 November in Rome, Italy. Results will also be published on IPv6 Act Now: http://ipv6actnow.org Please provide your name and contact information on the survey form if you wish to receive the draft survey analysis when available. Please also indicate whether you are willing to share additional data with the TNO and GNKS Consult IPv6 Deployment Monitoring team. Any questions concerning the survey itself should be addressed to <info(a)gnksconsult.com>. Regards, Paul Rendek Head of External Relations and Communications RIPE NCC

2 1