Scanning for IoT devices
Hi. I am new to this list but not new to RIPE. I am looking for stats on IoT devices similar in nature to the Shadowserver work: https://dashboard.shadowserver.org/statistics/iot-devices/map/ What they display for IoT devices are those devices that are open for port forwarding. But nowadays, the vast amount of IoT devices do not use port forwarding but are rather cloud based. Test by simply looking for Ring doorbells or Samsung refrigerators - of which there are millions. In their dashboard they are not even listed as a single device. Can someone point me to alternative data on IoT devices similar in style to the Shadowserver work - broken down by regions or countries, or by product types? Thanks, Hank
Hank Nussbacher <hank@interall.co.il> wrote: > I am new to this list but not new to RIPE. I am looking for stats on IoT > devices similar in nature to the Shadowserver work: > https://dashboard.shadowserver.org/statistics/iot-devices/map/ So what would you expect new work to say? > What they display for IoT devices are those devices that are open for port > forwarding. But nowadays, the vast amount of IoT devices do not use I think that it was a very small percentage of IoT devices that used port forwarding to begin with. Yes, that number may still be in the hundreds of millions. More often than not, the UPnP required for automatic opening ports did not work. Industrial IoT, which is often an integrated verticle usually has a controller; whether it's on-prem or cloud is another question. Meanwhile, I feel surprised that CSA/Matter has not taken off more. At least, for residential users. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
participants (2)
-
Hank Nussbacher -
Michael Richardson