On 10/9/18 4:27 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
It’s uncomfortable to do this when the WG has argely been silent about how the leadership is selected.
the WG (or at the very least the list) has been pretty silent, period.
So could you please indicate your support or opposition to the following? Thanks.
I support this process.
(1) The IoT WG will have 2 co-chairs who serve staggered 2-year terms. (2) A co-chair cannot serve more than 3 consecutive terms. (3) Each year, the longest serving co-chair will stand down and subject to (2) may make themselves available for re-appointment. (4) The incoming co-chair will be chosen by the WG using consensus and the remaining co-chair will make the consensus determination. (5) Any circumstances not covered by the above will be resolved by the RIPE Chair whose decision will be final.
Jelte