Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote: >> I bring this up because I won't really know who a good co-chair is >> until I have a better idea what we are doing. Or to put it another >> way, maybe candidates could also say what they would do this way. > Well now’s your chance Michael. :-) What would you do as co-chair? I'm no longer convinced that there is actually any relevant work for us to do. So, I might actually just close the group. I'm not convinced that the people who are participating in this WG are connected to the right operational places in ISPs. I think that we are all (quite experienced and smart) IoT hackers who have ideas about what the right thing to do, but we don't actually to implement our ideas much. > Participants from outside the RIPE region are just as welcome as > anybody else IMO. RIPE has had co-chairs who were based outside RIPE’s > service region or had out-of-region nationality. Maybe it still does. I > would hope the WG picks its co-chairs based on merit rather than who > issued their passport. It's not about passports, I think, but about attendance. I won't volunteer as co-chair for the reason that I don't think that I'll attend many meetings in person. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide