I agree, this may also be the time to consider whether the voting process can be done differently/better. Groet, Eric Von: "Gordon Lennox" <gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com> An: "IoT WG RIPE" <iot-wg@ripe.net> Kopie: "Peter Koch" <pk@DENIC.DE> Datum: 25-04-2019 09:15 Betreff: Re: [iot-wg] extension of co-chair selection process Gesendet von: "iot-wg" <iot-wg-bounces@ripe.net> A pragmatic way forward? I know it is what we tend to expect from Peter. But why not? Gordon
On 25 Apr 2019, at 08:49, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:
Jim, all,
for one, "expressing support" per thread is voting, not consensus building. In that spirit, since the WG is perspectively looking for two new chairs anyway, and both canditates do seem qualified to me while at the same time offering different perspectives and background, I do not see a need for a continued beauty contest but would like to suggest instead to appoint both Sandoche and Peter. That would ease the onboarding process, as well. When it comes to the staggered terms, we can still have the two draw straws (well, an IoT WG should really let them draw batteries instead ...).
Regards, Peter
_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg