Hi all, A colleague in a working group, Sivasubramanian M, brought up to the same article on the Dynamic Coalition on Core Internet Values list. He said:* "Bruce Schneier says that the only solution is to 'regulate.' I would differ somewhat and say that the solution lies in architectural attention and in standardization plus just a little bit of registration. IAB, IETF, ISOC, and ICANN could pay attention and minimise the need for 'regulation.'"* I agreed with Bruce's suggestion, but with that said, I think it's critical that the solutions to this problem take a multistakeholder and collaborative approach. I don't see why regulation in addition to Siva's suggestions have to be mutually exclusive. Best, -Michael On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13@gmail.com> wrote:
I think you can already guess my response.
Regulation will happen. Individual organisations and experts from within the community will probably be involved somehow. But I think the RIPE community as such should be involved. If not we will effectively leave it to other groups such as ETNO, GSMA and so on.
If you do not involved then you cannot really complain afterwards.
Gordon
On 22 November 2016 at 05:51, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
Gordon,
He's not wrong. But is there a path to reasonable regulation? Can RIPE help facilitate this in any way?
////snip
Cheers,
-- Shane
_______________________________________________ iot-discussion mailing list iot-discussion@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion