I agree. A very good starting point.
On 12 May 2017, at 10:22, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
On 11 May 2017, at 17:26, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:
While there is no shortage on IoT fora/consortia etc, I agree that a venue on the topic of "IoT" in the RIPE community is useful
o to discuss challenges and opportunities of "IoT" for the RIPE community
o to serve as a focal point for the NCC regarding community input to their IoT activities, including liaisons
o to invite IoT communities to for a dialogue on matters of operational relevance, including security, the numbering system, and applicability of standards
o to develop positions of the RIPE community on IoT matters, operational and beyond
Peter, I think this is very close to what the proposed WG's charter should be.
_______________________________________________ iot-discussion mailing list iot-discussion@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion