October 2020 - iot-wg - mailman.ripe.net

it's co-chair selection time!
by Jim Reid 16 May '22

16 May '22

My term as WG co-chair ends at RIPE80 or theresabouts. I will not be standing for another term. First of all, bringing in new and hopefully younger faces to freshen things up is long overdue. Second, I only volunteered to bootstrap the new WG. That has been completed. So it’s time to step away and let the WG find somebody else. There’s some info on WG co-chair responsibilities in RIPE692. Anyone interested in applying who wants more advice on what the job entails, likely time commitments and so on is welcome to contact Sandoche or myself. Or any other recent/current WG co-chair for that matter. I would also ask potential candidates to start a *new thread* -- eg "Your name for co-chair" or something like that -- when they post on the list so there are meaningful and relevant Subject: headers which make it easier to make a consensus judgement. It’ll save the current co-chairs reading every message on the mailing list to decide if they contain something in favour or against a particular candidate. This will also make it clearer for other members of the list to express their support (or not) for a candidate. Anyone can volunteer to become a co-chair and you can even nominate yourself. There’s no requirement to have N people nominating a candidate for them be considered for selection (for values of N > 1). Ideally, it would be good to be able to announce the new co-chair at RIPE80. Though that could be too short notice since the meeting’s just under 4 weeks away. If you think more time is needed to decide, please speak up. There’s no firm deadline and we should take our time about making this appointment - provided of course the new co-chair is in place in plenty of time for RIPE81. Although I think 4 weeks (ish) should be long enough to find a new co-chair, this is for the WG to decide too.

11 19

A Haystack Full of Needles: Scalable Detection of IoT Devices in the Wild
by Mandalari, Anna Maria 13 Dec '20

13 Dec '20

Hi all, We have published an interesting work on consumer IoT devices detection at an ISP and IXP. You can find all the details at https://moniotrlab.ccis.neu.edu/imc20/ The paper will be presented at IMC 2020. I thought it can be interesting for you :) Cheers, -- Anna Maria Mandalari Research Associate Dyson School of Design Engineering Imperial College London https://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/anna-maria.mandalari

2 1

Results of the survey made during the second today's presentation
by sandoche Balakrichenan 30 Oct '20

30 Oct '20

Dear all, Please find as attached the results of the survey conducted today during the presentation of "*Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security in the Home. A guide for ISPs specifying CPE devices*" at RIPE 81 IoT WG slot today.

3 5

Re: [iot-wg] IoT BCOP TF Document - Call for comments
by e.vanuden＠avm.de 27 Oct '20

27 Oct '20

Hi Eliot, I´m refering to the Stacked Router concept, so one CPE instead of two (stacked) In this case, the CPE Best regards, Eric van Uden AVM ICT GmbH Country Manager Netherlands Mr. van Coothlaan 10 6602 GT Wijchen Nederland Phone +31 24 6485381 Mobile +31 622 948356 e.vanuden(a)avm.de Bezoek onze website op http://nl.avm.de/ , vind ons leuk op Facebook of bekijk onze Google +-pagina en Youtube-kanaal. AVM GmbH for International Communication Technology, Alt-Moabit 95, 10559 Berlin, Germany HRB 48220 AG Charlottenburg, CEO (Geschäftsführer): Johannes Nill Von: "Eliot Lear" <lear(a)ofcourseimright.com> An: e.vanuden(a)avm.de, "sandoche Balakrichenan" <sandoche.balakrichenan(a)afnic.fr> Kopie: iot-wg(a)ripe.net Datum: 26-10-2020 14:21 Betreff: Re: [iot-wg] IoT BCOP TF Document - Call for comments Hi Eric, On 26.10.20 14:18, Eric van Uden via iot-wg wrote: For me this means that IoT security should be implemented in as little as possible devices connection the consumer to the internet - one device if at all possible thus avoiding stacked router scenarios that add unnecessary complexity and possibly even more IoT security issues. Precisely which device would you expect that to be: The CPE or the IOT device? Eliot

3 3

IoT BCOP TF Document - Call for comments
by sandoche Balakrichenan 26 Oct '20

26 Oct '20

Dear all, The IoT BCOP TF (/Jim Reid, Eliott Lear, Michael Richardson, Phil Stanhope, Peter Steinhäuser, Jelte Jansen, Jan Zorz, Sandoche Balakrichenan/) has been meeting almost every friday since RIPE 80 to produce the document titled : /"Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security in the Home - //A guide for ISPs specifying CPE devices"/. The intention is to publish the final version of this document as RIPE Best Current Operational Practice (BCOP) document in the IoT scope. A Pdf format of the document is attached. Thanks for sending your comments on this document to the mailing list. Constanze & Sandoche (IoT WG Chairs)

4 3

Reminder: IoT WG (and friends) virtual Meetup tonight!
by Constanze Dietrich 26 Oct '20

26 Oct '20

*** Cancel all your dates! *** Tonight from 19:00 to 21:00 CET (UTC+1) we'll have our virtual Meetup "at the hotel bar"! Location: https://ripe.zoom.us/j/96850826494?pwd=ZGFlbFNRZTZZTnBZU1JiWWNNRms0dz09#suc… Meeting ID: 968 5082 6494 Passcode: 391117 Hope to see you all there! Constanze & Sandoche

1 0

Re: [iot-wg] IoT BCOP TF Document - Call for comments
by Michael Richardson 23 Oct '20

23 Oct '20

<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> sb> The IoT BCOP TF (/Jim Reid, Eliott Lear, Michael Richardson, Phil sb> Stanhope, Peter Steinhäuser, Jelte Jansen, Jan Zorz, Sandoche sb> Balakrichenan/) has been meeting almost every friday since RIPE 80 to sb> produce the document titled : /"Architectural Considerations for IoT sb> Device Security in the Home - //A guide for ISPs specifying CPE sb> devices"/. The intention is to publish the final version of this sb> document as RIPE Best Current Operational Practice (BCOP) document in sb> the IoT scope. Some feedback that we have received is that the document isn't able to provide clear guidance that would make it a BCOP. It is perhaps more of a technical report. An initial goal had been to be able to say what ISPs are currently doing with IoT devices, and thereby enable those who are writing RFPs to know what kind of things they might expect to be able to ask for. But, it's still too soon for that. So a question is: what category should we put on this document? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(a)sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

1 0

RIPE81 agenda and virtual meetup on 26 October
by Constanze Dietrich 19 Oct '20

19 Oct '20

Hi everyone! We've got two announcements regarding the upcoming RIPE meeting! ***** THE AGENDA for the IoT session of RIPE 81 (27 to 30 October) is set! ***** You can find the full Meeting Plan here: https://ripe81.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ This time, we have 45 minutes on Thursday, 29 October, between 14:00 and 14:45 CET (UTC+1): -- Introduction (5 minutes) -- RIPE NCC IoT Update - MarcoHogewoning (10 minutes) -- Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security in the Home: A guide for ISPs specifying CPE devices - IoT BCOP Task Force (30 minutes) [Quick reminder to review their work and help them with constructive feedback: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20201013/5ab7a0d… ] ***** VIRTUAL MEETUP of the IoT WG (and friends) on Monday, 26 October, 19:00 to 21:00 CET (UTC+1) ***** As having 15 minutes more on hand than last time is certainly no substitute for coffee and lunch breaks, beerings or other social gatherings, we've arranged for a virtual get-together on Monday evening before RIPE 81 as a Zoom meeting. There's no agenda! We'd like to say hi, get to see and know each other, and have a few drinks of our choice together at the virtual "hotel bar". You'll find the link to the Zoom meeting here: https://ripe81.ripe.net/programme/parallel-events/#iot Hope to see you there! Constanze & Sandoche (IoT WG Chairs)

1 0

Fwd: interesting article
by sandoche Balakrichenan 04 Oct '20

04 Oct '20

Dear all, Vesna (RIPE) send us the following article ("Security Considerations for Internet of Things: A Survey"), which I am sure will be an interesting read. === https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs42979-020-00201-3 Survey Article Published: 06 June 2020 Security Considerations for Internet of Things: A Survey Anca Jurcut, Tiberiu Niculcea, Pasika Ranaweera & Nhien-An Le-Khac === Sandoche.

1 0