Dear all, As discussed recently on the list, the chairs have commenced preparing a status page to identify and document the various ENUM projects being conducted in different countries. We would like feedback on the formulation of the questions. At present they are based heavily on those developed by Joakim Strålmark of the Swedish PTS in a recent survey. If there is additional information that would be useful, or if there is a better formulation for the questions, please provide your input. Most important we would like contributions of information on the various trials being conducted, so we can start populating the table with data. The page is available for the moment at this address: http://www.centr.org/kim/enum/index.html best regards, kim -- Kim Davies, Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries Avenue Louise 327, B-1050 Brussels; Tel. +32 2 627 5550
At 11:47 AM 9/8/2004, Kim Davies wrote:
Dear all,
As discussed recently on the list, the chairs have commenced preparing a status page to identify and document the various ENUM projects being conducted in different countries.
We would like feedback on the formulation of the questions. At present they are based heavily on those developed by Joakim Strålmark of the Swedish PTS in a recent survey. If there is additional information that would be useful, or if there is a better formulation for the questions, please provide your input.
Most important we would like contributions of information on the various trials being conducted, so we can start populating the table with data.
The page is available for the moment at this address:
well I can help with a few ... As for the the United States .. and in part CC 1 aka the NANP ... DISCLAIMER THESE ARE PERSONAL OPINIONS ETC The United States ENUM forum is located at.. http://www.enum-forum.org/ The Canadian ENUM forum is located at. http://www.enumorg.ca/ To my knowledge no other national ENUM forums are currently operating within the NANP administration area. What is the country and E.164 code? The North American Numbering Plan [aka CC 1] (NANP) is an integrated telephone numbering plan serving 19 North American countries that share its resources. These countries include the United States and its territories, Canada, Bermuda, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, the Bahamas, Barbados, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Dominica, the Dominican Republic, Grenada, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, and Turks & Caicos. NANP numbers are ten-digit numbers consisting of a three-digit Numbering Plan Area (NPA) code, commonly called an area code, followed by a seven-digit local number. The format is usually represented as NPA-NXX-XXXX Who is the delegate for the E.164 code? The status of ENUM within CC 1 is under considerable discussion . The management of 1 NPA resources will be determined on a nation state basis. The status of deployment (notdelegated>applied>delegated/objected>trial>hiatus>production) Not delegated. However it is probable that delegation will occur at the 1 NPA level directly from the ENUM root aka RIPE NCC. ENUM Project contact details (telephone, email, web) Is a trial being, or going to be, conducted? As of 9.2004 there is speculation that trials could be authorized shortly. Is there work or plans toward full permanent deployment? Yes. See national ENUM forums for documentary details. Who is leading the ENUM project? (government, industry working group, etc.) Industry Working Groups in consultation with appropriate National Regulatory Authorities. Who operates the ccTLD for that country at present? .CA is operated by The Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA). A not for profit Canadian corporation that is responsible for operating the dot-ca Internet country code Top Level Domain (ccTLD) for all Canadians in an efficient and professional manner. http://www.cira.ca/ .US is operated by NeuStar under contract to the United States Department of Commerce http://www.neustar.us/ What type of organization runs the ccTLD? (state, private, academic, etc.) See above. NeuStar is a privately held United States Corporation. What is the ccTLD legal regulation, if any? for .CA see http://www.cira.ca/en/cat_Cira.html for .US see http://www.neustar.us/policies/index.html Who is the current Tier 1 registry? TBD To be determined Who is, or will be, the permanent Tier 1 registry? TBD How will the Tier 1 registry selection be made? (i.e. decision, license, concession, agreement, public procurement, etc.) Discussions in the United States and Canada have focused on fair and open competitive bidding process. How will the method of cost recovery for the Tier 1 registry's operations? TBD Will there be more than one Tier 1 provider for the country? TBD Will there be ENUM registrars? TBD What will be the ENUM validation technique? TBD Is there/will there be a special number block for ENUM and/or IP Telephony Currently the North American Numbering plan is a "flat namespace". Thereare no service specific blocks associated with it other than freephone (800-866-877 etc.) Wireless specific overlay codes have been authorized but not implemented. There is no current discussion any form of VoIP specific numbering code. Is there special treatment for unlisted numbers? TBD Are there any plans for infrastructure ENUM? Several companies in the United States are already providing infrastructure ENUM services on a private commercial basis. What is your ENUM WHOIS address? Not Available Please provide the history of ENUM trials, projects etc., if any. What are your future plans? (and dates if available) What is your date estimate on a production ENUM registry launch? IMHO 2005
best regards,
kim -- Kim Davies, Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries Avenue Louise 327, B-1050 Brussels; Tel. +32 2 627 5550
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141@fwd.pulver.com ENUM +87810-13313-31331 PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 815.333.1237 <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
What is the country and E.164 code? Germany & +49 Who is the delegate for the E.164 code? DENIC eG Wiesenhüttenplatz 26 60329 Frankfurt Germany The status of deployment (notdelegated>applied>delegated/objected>trial>hiatus>production) trial ENUM Project contact details (telephone, email, web) +49 69 27235 0 enum@denic.de www.denic.de/en/enum Is a trial being, or going to be, conducted? A trial is on the way What type of numbers are being used in the trial? geographical, freephone and mobil numbers. Is there work or plans toward full permanent deployment? That should be the result of the trial. What type of numbers are to be used in full deployment? That should be the result of the trial. Who is leading the ENUM project? (government, industry working group, etc.) Industry. Who operates the ccTLD for that country at present? DENIC eG Wiesenhüttenplatz 26 60329 Frankfurt Germany What type of organisation runs the ccTLD? (state, private, academic, etc.) private What is the ccTLD legal regulation, if any? None Who is the current Tier 1 registry? DENIC eG Wiesenhüttenplatz 26 60329 Frankfurt Germany Who is, or will be, the permanent Tier 1 registry? A recommendation can be result of the trial. How will the Tier 1 registry selection be made? (i.e. decision, license, concession, agreement, public procurement, etc.) A recommendation can be result of the trial. How will the method of cost recovery for the Tier 1 registry's operations? A recommendation can be result of the trial. Will there be more than one Tier 1 provider for the country? A recommendation can be result of the trial. Will there be ENUM registrars? Most probably. What will be the ENUM validation technique? A recommendation can be result of the trial. Is there/will there be a special number block for ENUM and/or IP Telephony? There is currently a proposal from the German regulation authority to implement a special numbering block in the future. Is there special treatment for unlisted numbers? No. Are there any plans for infrastructure ENUM? Some. What is your ENUM WHOIS address? We don't have currently ENUM WHOIS Please provide the history of ENUM trials, projects etc., if any. Please see www.denic.de/en/enum What are your future plans? (and dates if available) What is your date estimate on a production ENUM registry launch? Not yet decided Viele Grüße Sabine Dolderer -- Sabine Dolderer DENIC eG Wiesenhüttenplatz 26 D-60329 Frankfurt eMail: Sabine.Dolderer@denic.de Fon: +49 69 27235 0 Fax: +49 69 27235 235 Kim Davies <kim@centr.org> Gesendet von: enum-wg-admin@ripe.net An enum-wg@ripe.net 08.09.2004 17:47 Kopie Thema [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects $MessageID: <413F298A.7050301@centr.org> SendTo: enum-wg@ripe.net Subject: [enum-wg] Survey on ENUM Projects From: enum-wg-admin@ripe.net PostedDate: 08.09.2004 17:47:22 Received: from smtp.denic.de ([81.91.161.3]) by notes.denic.de with ESMTP id 2004090817480334-23208 ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:48:03 +0200 Received: from postboy.ripe.net (postboy.ripe.net [193.0.0.201]) by smtp.denic.de with esmtp id 1C54fz-0000Dp-2Q; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:48:03 +0200 Received: from postboy.ripe.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303C06DEAF; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:48:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 920AA71D06; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:47:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.0.199]) by postboy.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8614E6DEAF for <enum-wg@postboy.ripe.net>; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:47:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 810674E633; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:47:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kaiser.centr.org (s15114026.rootmaster.info [217.160.143.182]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC954E7B8 for <enum-wg@ripe.net>; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:47:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kaiser.centr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2154A3FA0C3 for <enum-wg@ripe.net>; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered_To: enum-wg@lists.ripe.net PRINCIPAL: Kim Davies <kim@centr.org> Organization: Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries User_Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X_Accept_Language: en-us, en MIME_Version: 1.0 X_RIPE_Spam_Level: ** X_RIPE_Spam_Status: U 0.414415 / 0.0 / 1.5 / disabled X_RIPE_Signature: 042e79c33721cb31ef5466046d4e6d2e Errors_To: enum-wg-admin@ripe.net X_BeenThere: enum-wg@ripe.net X_Mailman_Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List_Id: Mailing list for the ENUM working group <enum-wg.ripe.net> list_post: <mailto:enum-wg@ripe.net> X_RIPE_Lists: Mailing list for the ENUM working group <enum-wg.ripe.net> List_Subscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/enum-wg>, <mailto:enum-wg-request@ripe.net?subject=subscribe> List_Unsubscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/enum-wg>, <mailto:enum-wg-request@ripe.net?subject=unsubscribe> list_help: <mailto:enum-wg-request@ripe.net?subject=help> List_Archive: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/private/enum-wg/> $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on notes/Denic(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 08.09.2004 17:48:03;MIME-CD by Notes Client on Sabine Dolderer/Denic(Release 6.0.2CF1|June 9, 2003) at 09.09.2004 12:06:08;MIME-CD complete at 09.09.2004 12:06:08 SMTPOriginator: enum-wg-admin@ripe.net $TKAttaConversion: DONE 0.000sec $TkFlag50: starting jobs # notes/Denic # 08.09.2004 17:48:03 # Process M05;jobs ended # notes/Denic # 08.09.2004 17:48:04 RouteServers: CN=notes/O=Denic RouteTimes: 08.09.2004 17:48:03-08.09.2004 17:48:05 DeliveredDate: 08.09.2004 17:48:05 $MiniView: $Highlights_Subject: $Highlights_Body: $Highlights_denicReceived: $EncryptionStatus: 0 $SignatureStatus: 0 Dear all, As discussed recently on the list, the chairs have commenced preparing a status page to identify and document the various ENUM projects being conducted in different countries. We would like feedback on the formulation of the questions. At present they are based heavily on those developed by Joakim Strålmark of the Swedish PTS in a recent survey. If there is additional information that would be useful, or if there is a better formulation for the questions, please provide your input. Most important we would like contributions of information on the various trials being conducted, so we can start populating the table with data. The page is available for the moment at this address: http://www.centr.org/kim/enum/index.html best regards, kim -- Kim Davies, Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries Avenue Louise 327, B-1050 Brussels; Tel. +32 2 627 5550
participants (3)
-
Kim Davies -
Richard Shockey -
Sabine Dolderer/Denic