From the current draft minutes from RIPE 54: Y. A.O.B. Niall explained that there is pressure to provide more space for the Address Policy WG, and the suggestion was made that there are some WGs whose communities are not be very interested in AP. Are there people here who wouldn't mind this session being parallel to AP. Carsten asked if Niall could send this to the list. ACTION 54.3: Niall O'Reilly to ask mailing list about having the ENUM WG session in parallel with the AP WG session at future RIPE Meetings. The meeting plan for RIPE 55 is currently being discussed among the WG Chairs and the NCC. As of the current draft, scheduling ENUM and Address Policy in parallel seems not to be under consideration, but re- arrangement to deal with other conflicts is likely and may change this. Please speak up, anyone for whom simultaneous scheduling of ENUM and Address Policy WG sessions would be a problem. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group